On the Intersections of Archives and History : Introduction The Emergence of the Archival Divide : Part One Authoritative History and Authoritative Archives The Turn Away from Historical Authority in the Archives Archival Authorities and New Technologies The Turn Away from Archival Authority in History Archival Essentialism and the Archival Divide Processing the Past : Part Two The Social Memory Problem Contested Archives, Contested Sources The Archivist as Activist in the Production of (Historical) Knowledge Rethinking Archival Politics : Trust, Truth, and the Law Archives and the Cyberinfrastructure Can History and Archives Reconnect : Bridging the Archival Divide
"Processing the Past" explores the dramatic changes taking place in historical understanding and archival management, and hence the relations between historians and archivists.Written by an archivist and a historian, it shows how these changes have been brought on by new historical thinking, new conceptions of archives, changing notions of historical authority, modifications in archival practices, and new information technologies.The book takes an "archival turn" by situating arcliives as subjects rather than places of study, and examining the increasingly problematic relationships between historical and archival work. By showing how nineteenth- and early twentieth-century historians and archivists in Europe and North America came to occupy the same conceptual and methodological space, the book sets the background to these changes. In the past, authoritative history was based on authoritative archives and mutual understandings of scientific research. These connections changed as historians began to ask questions not easily answered by traditional documentation, and archivists began to confront an unmanageable increase in the amount of material they processed and the challenges of new electronic technologies. The authors contend that historians and archivists have divided into two entirely separate professions with distinct conceptual frameworks, training, and purposes, as well as different understandings of the authorities that govern their work. "Processing the Past" moves toward bridging this divide by speaking in one voice to these very different audiences. Blouin and Rosenberg conclude by raising the worrisome question of what future historical archives might be like if historical scholars and archivists no longer understand each other, and indeed, whether their now different notions of what is archival and historical will ever again be joined. Francis X. Blouin Jr. is director of the Bentley Historical Library and professor in the history department and School of Information at the University of Michigan. From 1984 to 2004 he led an effort to do a complete inventory of the archives of the Vatican. He has served on the board of the Council on Library and Information. William G. Rosenberg is professor emeritus of history at the University of Michigan. He has authored, co-authored, or edited some thirteen books on Russian and Soviet history. His interest in archival issues developed from his responsibilities as vice president for research of the American Historical Association. He has also served as president of the American Association for the Advancement of Slavic Studies, and is a vice chair of the board of trustees of the European University at St. Petersburg
